Comparative Analysis of Robotic-Assisted and Manual Total Knee Arthroplasty in Patients with Extra-Articular Deformities: A Propensity Score-Matched Prospective
Абасов Асадула Рауфович
- ORCID
- 0000-0003-2135-6906
Summary
- Study start
- 01.04.2026
- Number of participants
- Not specified
- Study phase
- I
- Study type
- Analytical
Study design
- Design type
- Single-group
- Randomization
- Not specified
- Blinding
- None
Study description
Short description
The primary aim of this study was to compare the rate of mechanical axis outliers (>3° deviation from target hip-knee-ankle angle) between RA-TKA and manual TKA in patients with EAD. Secondary aims included comparison of functional outcomes (KSS, FJS-12) at 12 months and exploratory subgroup analyses by deformity severity.
Detailed description
Not specified
PICO framework
Population
пациенты с гонартрозом
Intervention
Роботическое эндопротезирование коленного суства
Comparison
Мануальное эндопротезирование коленного сустава
Outcomes
превосходство роботического эндопротезирования по результатам контрольных рентгенограмм и функциональных шкал
Endpoints
Primary endpoints
Primary endpoint 1
better rate of mechanical axis outliers (>3° deviation from target hip-knee-ankle angle) between RA-TKA and manual TKA in patients with EAD.
Secondary endpoints
Secondary endpoint 1
better functional outcomes (KSS, FJS-12) at 12 months and exploratory subgroup analyses by deformity severity in RA-TKA group.
Criteria
No criteria specified
Statistical analysis plan
No statistical analysis plan specified
Ethics committee
under reviewStudy arms
RA-TKA
MANUAL-TKA
Additional information
No additional information
Version history
- Version 128.07.2026Compare
How to cite
Абасов А. Р. Comparative Analysis of Robotic-Assisted and Manual Total Knee Arthroplasty in Patients with Extra-Articular Deformities: A Propensity Score-Matched Prospective : clinical study registry record № NNADM310884, version 1 dated 07/28/2026 [Electronic resource] // ClinicalStudy.ru. URL: https://clinicalstudy.ru/researches/2f28c0ca-f670-45c8-86ad-b188e08e62ff (accessed: 07/28/2026).
The reference pins version 1 — readers will always be able to tell which revision of the protocol you cited.
Comments